Fish SpeechvsKarakeep
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Fish Speech | Karakeep | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech | #1 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing |
| GitHub stars | 33 461 | 30 138 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +138 | +877 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 5 |
| Latest release | — | v0.34.1 · 22 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Karakeep scores 82/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.
Karakeep ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.
If you want the quickest setup, Karakeep is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.
Karakeep is growing faster right now (+877 stars in 30 days).
Fish Speech details →Karakeep details →
Swap a project
Keep Fish Speech, compare it with
Keep Karakeep, compare it with