AppsmithvsOctoprint
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Appsmith | Octoprint | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Internal Tools | #1 of 22 in 3D Printing |
| GitHub stars | 41 135 | 9 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +204 | +59 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 5 |
| Latest release | v2.6.0 · 28 Oct 2026 | 1.11.8 · 23 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Appsmith scores 80/100 against 73/100 for Octoprint, so it is the safer default.
Appsmith ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Octoprint.
Appsmith is growing faster right now (+204 stars in 30 days).
Appsmith details →Octoprint details →
Swap a project
Keep Appsmith, compare it with
Keep Octoprint, compare it with