apitablevsWastebin
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| apitable | Wastebin | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #4 of 19 in Pastebins |
| GitHub stars | 15 653 | 880 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +20 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | 3.9.0 · 15 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
apitable scores 65/100 against 56/100 for Wastebin, so it is the safer default.
Wastebin ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.
If you want the quickest setup, Wastebin is easier to run; apitable needs more configuration.
apitable details →Wastebin details →