apitablevsTraceRoot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| apitable | TraceRoot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #11 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 15 653 | 1 104 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v1.3.3 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
apitable scores 65/100 against 58/100 for TraceRoot, so it is the safer default.
TraceRoot ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.
If you want the quickest setup, apitable is easier to run; TraceRoot needs more configuration.
apitable is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).
apitable details →TraceRoot details →