apitablevsswarm-cronjob
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| apitable | swarm-cronjob | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #20 of 26 in Automation |
| GitHub stars | 15 653 | 888 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +34 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 |
| Latest release | — | v1.16.1 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
apitable scores 65/100 against 51/100 for swarm-cronjob, so it is the safer default.
swarm-cronjob ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.
If you want the quickest setup, swarm-cronjob is easier to run; apitable needs more configuration.
apitable is growing faster right now (+34 stars in 30 days).
apitable details →swarm-cronjob details →