nocodbvsswarm-cronjob
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| nocodb | swarm-cronjob | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms | #20 of 26 in Automation |
| GitHub stars | 65 381 | 888 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +319 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 3 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.16.1 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
nocodb scores 81/100 against 51/100 for swarm-cronjob, so it is the safer default.
nocodb ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for swarm-cronjob.
If you want the quickest setup, swarm-cronjob is easier to run; nocodb needs more configuration.
nocodb is growing faster right now (+319 stars in 30 days).
nocodb details →swarm-cronjob details →
Swap a project
Keep nocodb, compare it with
Keep swarm-cronjob, compare it with