apitablevsScreenTinker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| apitable | ScreenTinker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 53/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #4 of 7 in Digital Signage |
| GitHub stars | 15 654 | 242 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v3.0.3 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
apitable scores 65/100 against 53/100 for ScreenTinker, so it is the safer default.
ScreenTinker ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.
apitable is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).
apitable details →ScreenTinker details →