apitablevsRequest Tracker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| apitable | Request Tracker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #3 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 15 654 | 1 164 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 2 |
| Latest release | — | rt-5.0.10 · 1 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Perl |
Which one should you pick?
apitable and Request Tracker score the same (65/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Request Tracker ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.
If you want the quickest setup, apitable is easier to run; Request Tracker needs more configuration.
apitable is growing faster right now (+35 stars in 30 days).
apitable details →Request Tracker details →