langflowvsRequest Tracker
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| langflow | Request Tracker | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 65/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 209 in AI Agents | #3 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 156 131 | 1 164 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +909 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 2 |
| Latest release | v1.12.8 · 21 Oct 2026 | rt-5.0.10 · 1 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Perl |
Which one should you pick?
langflow scores 90/100 against 65/100 for Request Tracker, so it is the safer default.
langflow ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Request Tracker.
If you want the quickest setup, langflow is easier to run; Request Tracker needs more configuration.
langflow is growing faster right now (+909 stars in 30 days).
langflow details →Request Tracker details →
Swap a project
Keep langflow, compare it with
Keep Request Tracker, compare it with