apitablevsOrca
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| apitable | Orca | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 91/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #1 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 15 653 | 108 815 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | +8 908 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 15 |
| Latest release | — | v1.4.243 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Orca scores 91/100 against 65/100 for apitable, so it is the safer default.
Orca ships more often: 15 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.
If you want the quickest setup, Orca is easier to run; apitable needs more configuration.
Orca is growing faster right now (+8 908 stars in 30 days).
apitable details →Orca details →