apitablevsopenHop Repeater
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| apitable | openHop Repeater | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 17 in Low Code | #2 of 10 in Network |
| GitHub stars | 15 653 | 298 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +36 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 1 |
| Latest release | — | 1.1.4 · 8 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
apitable scores 65/100 against 51/100 for openHop Repeater, so it is the safer default.
openHop Repeater ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for apitable.
If you want the quickest setup, apitable is easier to run; openHop Repeater needs more configuration.
apitable is growing faster right now (+36 stars in 30 days).
apitable details →openHop Repeater details →