AnubisvsWildbox
Two self-hosted Security projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Anubis | Wildbox | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 78 in Security | #56 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 23 789 | 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 138 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.28.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.12.2 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Anubis scores 80/100 against 44/100 for Wildbox, so it is the safer default.
Anubis ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Wildbox.
If you want the quickest setup, Anubis is easier to run; Wildbox needs more configuration.
Anubis is growing faster right now (+1 138 stars in 30 days).
Anubis details →Wildbox details →All Security projects →
Swap a project
Keep Anubis, compare it with
Keep Wildbox, compare it with