Anubisvsmitmproxy
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Anubis | mitmproxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 78 in Security | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 23 771 | 46 446 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 135 | +1 311 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 5 |
| Latest release | v1.28.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 80/100 for Anubis, so it is the safer default.
Anubis ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.
Anubis details →mitmproxy details →
Swap a project
Keep Anubis, compare it with
Keep mitmproxy, compare it with