Anubisvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Anubis | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 78 in Security | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 23 771 | 93 034 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 135 | +1 287 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 19 |
| Latest release | v1.28.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 80/100 for Anubis, so it is the safer default.
uptime-kuma ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Anubis.
If you want the quickest setup, uptime-kuma is easier to run; Anubis needs more configuration.
Anubis details →uptime-kuma details →
Swap a project
Keep Anubis, compare it with
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with