AnubisvsTorollo
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Anubis | Torollo | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 78 in Security | #15 of 30 in Education |
| GitHub stars | 23 789 | 449 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 153 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.28.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.2.5 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Anubis scores 80/100 against 47/100 for Torollo, so it is the safer default.
Anubis ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Torollo.
If you want the quickest setup, Torollo is easier to run; Anubis needs more configuration.
Anubis is growing faster right now (+1 153 stars in 30 days).
Anubis details →Torollo details →
Swap a project
Keep Anubis, compare it with
Keep Torollo, compare it with