Anubisvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Anubis | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 78 in Security | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 23 789 | 24 047 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 153 | +787 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.28.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 83/100 against 80/100 for Anubis, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Anubis is easier to run; temporal needs more configuration.
Anubis details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep Anubis, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with