AnubisvsStirling-PDF
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Anubis | Stirling-PDF | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 78 in Security | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 23 783 | 95 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 147 | +2 347 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 11 | 25 |
| Latest release | v1.28.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 80/100 for Anubis, so it is the safer default.
Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for Anubis.
Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 347 stars in 30 days).
Anubis details →Stirling-PDF details →
Swap a project
Keep Anubis, compare it with
Keep Stirling-PDF, compare it with