MastodonvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mastodon | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 50 457 | 117 704 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +138 | +5 345 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 38 | 11 |
| Latest release | v4.4.26 · 1 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 82/100 for Mastodon, so it is the safer default.
Mastodon ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; Mastodon needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 345 stars in 30 days).
Mastodon details →TradingAgents details →