anarlogvsJoplin
Two self-hosted Notes & Editors projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| anarlog | Joplin | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #2 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 9 616 | 56 912 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +70 | +436 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 17 |
| Latest release | desktop_v1.4.33 · 27 Oct 2026 | v3.7.21 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Joplin scores 83/100 against 70/100 for anarlog, so it is the safer default.
Joplin ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for anarlog.
If you want the quickest setup, anarlog is easier to run; Joplin needs more configuration.
Joplin is growing faster right now (+436 stars in 30 days).
anarlog details →Joplin details →All Notes & Editors projects →
Swap a project
Keep anarlog, compare it with
Keep Joplin, compare it with