MemosvsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Memos | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 64 152 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +862 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 9 |
| Latest release | v0.31.0 · 19 Sept 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Memos scores 86/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.
Memos ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.
If you want the quickest setup, Memos is easier to run; Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes needs more configuration.
Memos is growing faster right now (+862 stars in 30 days).
Memos details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →
Swap a project
Keep Memos, compare it with
Keep Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, compare it with