Trilium Notesvswraft
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Trilium Notes | wraft | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 42 in Knowledge Management | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 38 608 | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +652 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 3 |
| Latest release | v0.106.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
Trilium Notes scores 83/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.
Trilium Notes ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for wraft.
If you want the quickest setup, Trilium Notes is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.
Trilium Notes is growing faster right now (+652 stars in 30 days).
Trilium Notes details →wraft details →
Swap a project
Keep Trilium Notes, compare it with
Keep wraft, compare it with