anarlogvsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| anarlog | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 9 616 | 89 717 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +70 | +2 428 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 17 |
| Latest release | desktop_v1.4.33 · 27 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 70/100 for anarlog, so it is the safer default.
World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for anarlog.
If you want the quickest setup, anarlog is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 428 stars in 30 days).
anarlog details →World Monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep anarlog, compare it with
Keep World Monitor, compare it with