anarlogvswoodpecker-ci
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| anarlog | woodpecker-ci | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #5 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 9 621 | 8 068 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +75 | +161 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 11 |
| Latest release | desktop_v1.4.33 · 27 Oct 2026 | v3.20.0 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Go |
Which one should you pick?
woodpecker-ci scores 73/100 against 70/100 for anarlog, so it is the safer default.
woodpecker-ci ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for anarlog.
If you want the quickest setup, anarlog is easier to run; woodpecker-ci needs more configuration.
woodpecker-ci is growing faster right now (+161 stars in 30 days).
anarlog details →woodpecker-ci details →
Swap a project
Keep anarlog, compare it with
Keep woodpecker-ci, compare it with