anarlogvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| anarlog | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 9 621 | 8 553 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +75 | +84 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 4 | 6 |
| Latest release | desktop_v1.4.34 · 29 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 70/100 for anarlog, so it is the safer default.
Tube Archivist ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for anarlog.
If you want the quickest setup, anarlog is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
anarlog details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep anarlog, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with