AgenvoyvsDeepSeek Harness
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Agenvoy | DeepSeek Harness | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 52/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #30 of 120 in AI Assistant | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 637 | 264 652 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +8 660 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.2.2 · 22 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
DeepSeek Harness scores 87/100 against 52/100 for Agenvoy, so it is the safer default.
Agenvoy ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for DeepSeek Harness.
If you want the quickest setup, Agenvoy is easier to run; DeepSeek Harness needs more configuration.
DeepSeek Harness is growing faster right now (+8 660 stars in 30 days).
Agenvoy details →DeepSeek Harness details →
Swap a project
Keep Agenvoy, compare it with
Keep DeepSeek Harness, compare it with