ActivityWatchvsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ActivityWatch | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Time Tracking | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 19 418 | 6 052 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +442 | +100 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.14.1 · 10 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
ActivityWatch scores 80/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
ActivityWatch ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, ActivityWatch is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
ActivityWatch is growing faster right now (+442 stars in 30 days).
ActivityWatch details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep ActivityWatch, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with