solidtimevsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| solidtime | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 11 in Time Tracking | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 9 056 | 6 050 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +128 | +98 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.22.1 · 21 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Zammad scores 70/100 against 69/100 for solidtime, so it is the safer default.
solidtime ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, solidtime is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
solidtime details →Zammad details →
Swap a project
Keep solidtime, compare it with
Keep Zammad, compare it with