ActivityWatchvsToolJet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ActivityWatch | ToolJet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 77/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Time Tracking | #1 of 17 in Low Code |
| GitHub stars | 19 421 | 41 141 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +445 | +154 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 76 |
| Latest release | v0.14.1 · 10 Oct 2026 | v3.20.251-lts · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | HTML |
Which one should you pick?
ActivityWatch scores 80/100 against 77/100 for ToolJet, so it is the safer default.
ToolJet ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for ActivityWatch.
ActivityWatch is growing faster right now (+445 stars in 30 days).
ActivityWatch details →ToolJet details →
Swap a project
Keep ActivityWatch, compare it with
Keep ToolJet, compare it with