ActivityWatchvsSuperset
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ActivityWatch | Superset | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Time Tracking | #1 of 15 in Business Intelligence |
| GitHub stars | 19 421 | 75 356 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +445 | +439 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 25 |
| Latest release | v0.14.1 · 10 Oct 2026 | superset-helm-chart-0.22.8 · 9 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Superset scores 88/100 against 80/100 for ActivityWatch, so it is the safer default.
Superset ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for ActivityWatch.
If you want the quickest setup, ActivityWatch is easier to run; Superset needs more configuration.
ActivityWatch details →Superset details →
Swap a project
Keep ActivityWatch, compare it with
Keep Superset, compare it with