active_workflowvsAutoGPT
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| active_workflow | AutoGPT | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 44/100 | 85/100 |
| Rank in category | #24 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #6 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 863 | 187 804 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +288 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |
Which one should you pick?
AutoGPT scores 85/100 against 44/100 for active_workflow, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, active_workflow is easier to run; AutoGPT needs more configuration.
AutoGPT is growing faster right now (+288 stars in 30 days).
active_workflow details →AutoGPT details →
Swap a project
Keep active_workflow, compare it with
Keep AutoGPT, compare it with