ActivepiecesvsPulse
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Activepieces | Pulse | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 32 in Workflow Automation | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 25 264 | 6 973 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +564 | +232 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 36 | 43 |
| Latest release | 0.90.4-hotfix.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Activepieces scores 81/100 against 71/100 for Pulse, so it is the safer default.
Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 36 for Activepieces.
Activepieces is growing faster right now (+564 stars in 30 days).
Activepieces details →Pulse details →
Swap a project
Keep Activepieces, compare it with
Keep Pulse, compare it with