ACE-StepvsReadMeABook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ACE-Step | ReadMeABook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #13 of 125 in AI | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 14 140 | 1 033 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 283 | +65 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 21 |
| Latest release | v0.1.8 · 18 May 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
ACE-Step scores 77/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.
ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for ACE-Step.
If you want the quickest setup, ACE-Step is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
ACE-Step is growing faster right now (+1 283 stars in 30 days).
ACE-Step details →ReadMeABook details →
Swap a project
Keep ACE-Step, compare it with
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with