openclawvsReadMeABook
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| openclaw | ReadMeABook | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 93/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 125 in AI | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 393 247 | 1 033 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 899 | +65 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 37 | 21 |
| Latest release | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 21 for ReadMeABook.
If you want the quickest setup, openclaw is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 899 stars in 30 days).
openclaw details →ReadMeABook details →
Swap a project
Keep openclaw, compare it with
Keep ReadMeABook, compare it with