abs-kosync-bridgevsstatic_status
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| abs-kosync-bridge | static_status | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 50/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #24 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 551 | 732 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 0 |
| Latest release | v7.11.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
abs-kosync-bridge scores 57/100 against 50/100 for static_status, so it is the safer default.
abs-kosync-bridge ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for static_status.
If you want the quickest setup, static_status is easier to run; abs-kosync-bridge needs more configuration.
abs-kosync-bridge is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).
abs-kosync-bridge details →static_status details →
Swap a project
Keep abs-kosync-bridge, compare it with
Keep static_status, compare it with