abs-kosync-bridgevsPostal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| abs-kosync-bridge | Postal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #3 of 16 in Mail Server |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 16 899 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +72 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 3 |
| Latest release | v7.11.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | 3.3.7 · 3 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Postal scores 72/100 against 57/100 for abs-kosync-bridge, so it is the safer default.
abs-kosync-bridge ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Postal.
If you want the quickest setup, abs-kosync-bridge is easier to run; Postal needs more configuration.
Postal is growing faster right now (+72 stars in 30 days).
abs-kosync-bridge details →Postal details →
Swap a project
Keep abs-kosync-bridge, compare it with
Keep Postal, compare it with