abs-kosync-bridgevsJmalCloud
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| abs-kosync-bridge | JmalCloud | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 57/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #10 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 550 | 882 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 9 |
| Latest release | v7.11.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v2.16.9 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
abs-kosync-bridge scores 57/100 against 48/100 for JmalCloud, so it is the safer default.
abs-kosync-bridge ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for JmalCloud.
If you want the quickest setup, JmalCloud is easier to run; abs-kosync-bridge needs more configuration.
JmalCloud is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).
abs-kosync-bridge details →JmalCloud details →
Swap a project
Keep abs-kosync-bridge, compare it with
Keep JmalCloud, compare it with