World MonitorvsZero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| World Monitor | Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #4 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 89 719 | 1 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 430 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 9 |
| Latest release | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 | 4.4.4 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 64/100 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, so it is the safer default.
World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 430 stars in 30 days).
World Monitor details →Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes details →
Swap a project
Keep World Monitor, compare it with
Keep Zero to JupyterHub with Kubernetes, compare it with