World MonitorvsXibo CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| World Monitor | Xibo CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #2 of 7 in Digital Signage |
| GitHub stars | 89 721 | 517 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 382 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 7 |
| Latest release | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 | 4.5.5 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 59/100 for Xibo CMS, so it is the safer default.
World Monitor ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Xibo CMS.
If you want the quickest setup, Xibo CMS is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 382 stars in 30 days).
World Monitor details →Xibo CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep World Monitor, compare it with
Keep Xibo CMS, compare it with