World MonitorvsWPS Office
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| World Monitor | WPS Office | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 86/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #6 of 6 in Office Suites |
| GitHub stars | 89 721 | 196 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +2 382 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 21 |
| Latest release | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 | 11.1.0.11723-2-ls194 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Dockerfile |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 52/100 for WPS Office, so it is the safer default.
WPS Office ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for World Monitor.
If you want the quickest setup, WPS Office is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 382 stars in 30 days).
World Monitor details →WPS Office details →
Swap a project
Keep World Monitor, compare it with
Keep WPS Office, compare it with