Workout.coolvsYarrtube
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Workout.cool | Yarrtube | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #84 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 8 652 | 198 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +153 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 45/100 for Yarrtube, so it is the safer default.
Workout.cool ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Yarrtube.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; Yarrtube needs more configuration.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+153 stars in 30 days).
Workout.cool details →Yarrtube details →
Swap a project
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with
Keep Yarrtube, compare it with