Workout.coolvsXibo CMS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Workout.cool | Xibo CMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #2 of 7 in Digital Signage |
| GitHub stars | 8 654 | 517 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +155 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 | 4.5.5 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 59/100 for Xibo CMS, so it is the safer default.
Xibo CMS ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; Xibo CMS needs more configuration.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).
Workout.cool details →Xibo CMS details →
Swap a project
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with
Keep Xibo CMS, compare it with