Workout.coolvswyoming-openwakeword
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Workout.cool | wyoming-openwakeword | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #7 of 11 in Voice Assistants |
| GitHub stars | 8 654 | 207 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +155 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 1 |
| Latest release | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 | v2.1.0 · 30 Oct 2025 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Workout.cool scores 66/100 against 45/100 for wyoming-openwakeword, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; wyoming-openwakeword needs more configuration.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).
Workout.cool details →wyoming-openwakeword details →
Swap a project
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with
Keep wyoming-openwakeword, compare it with