IncusvsZeroNet
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Incus | ZeroNet | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 44 in Container Management | #1 of 3 in Peer-to-Peer |
| GitHub stars | 6 517 | 18 786 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +277 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 0 |
| Latest release | v7.0.2 · 16 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Incus scores 75/100 against 63/100 for ZeroNet, so it is the safer default.
Incus ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for ZeroNet.
If you want the quickest setup, ZeroNet is easier to run; Incus needs more configuration.
Incus is growing faster right now (+277 stars in 30 days).
Incus details →ZeroNet details →
Swap a project
Keep Incus, compare it with
Keep ZeroNet, compare it with