Windows ARMvsZero-K
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Windows ARM | Zero-K | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Virtualization | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 2 260 | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +26 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Batchfile | Lua |
Which one should you pick?
Zero-K scores 62/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zero-K.
If you want the quickest setup, Zero-K is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
Zero-K is growing faster right now (+26 stars in 30 days).
Windows ARM details →Zero-K details →
Swap a project
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with
Keep Zero-K, compare it with