e2bvsZero-K
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| e2b | Zero-K | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #2 of 23 in Gaming |
| GitHub stars | 14 596 | 877 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +658 | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 | 0 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Lua |
Which one should you pick?
e2b scores 76/100 against 62/100 for Zero-K, so it is the safer default.
e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zero-K.
If you want the quickest setup, Zero-K is easier to run; e2b needs more configuration.
e2b is growing faster right now (+658 stars in 30 days).