Windows ARMvsZealot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Windows ARM | Zealot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Virtualization | #17 of 28 in CI/CD |
| GitHub stars | 2 260 | 1 368 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 3 |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 | 6.2.2 · 25 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Batchfile | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 55/100 for Zealot, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Zealot.
If you want the quickest setup, Zealot is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
Zealot is growing faster right now (+1 stars in 30 days).
Windows ARM details →Zealot details →
Swap a project
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with
Keep Zealot, compare it with