Windows ARMvsyoutube-dl-server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Windows ARM | youtube-dl-server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 61/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 15 in Virtualization | #31 of 45 in Download Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 260 | 319 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 0 |
| Latest release | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Batchfile | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Windows ARM scores 61/100 against 47/100 for youtube-dl-server, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for youtube-dl-server.
If you want the quickest setup, youtube-dl-server is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
Windows ARM details →youtube-dl-server details →
Swap a project
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with
Keep youtube-dl-server, compare it with