WhisperLive---CPUvsZabbix
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| WhisperLive---CPU | Zabbix | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 75/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 6 in Transcription | #13 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 4 337 | 6 518 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 | +107 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.10.0 · 7 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Go Template |
Which one should you pick?
Zabbix scores 75/100 against 64/100 for WhisperLive---CPU, so it is the safer default.
WhisperLive---CPU ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zabbix.
If you want the quickest setup, WhisperLive---CPU is easier to run; Zabbix needs more configuration.
Zabbix is growing faster right now (+107 stars in 30 days).
WhisperLive---CPU details →Zabbix details →
Swap a project
Keep WhisperLive---CPU, compare it with
Keep Zabbix, compare it with