web-checkvszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| web-check | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in OSINT | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 35 280 | 12 826 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +373 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 0 |
| Latest release | 2.3.0 · 2 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
web-check scores 81/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.
web-check ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.
If you want the quickest setup, web-check is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.
web-check is growing faster right now (+373 stars in 30 days).
web-check details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep web-check, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with