spiderfootvszookeeper
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| spiderfoot | zookeeper | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 78 in Security | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 24 030 | 12 825 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 538 | +14 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Java |
Which one should you pick?
spiderfoot scores 77/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.
spiderfoot is growing faster right now (+1 538 stars in 30 days).
spiderfoot details →zookeeper details →
Swap a project
Keep spiderfoot, compare it with
Keep zookeeper, compare it with